3 posts tagged “environment”
What's with all the grousing lately about "going green?" It seems like everywhere I look, people are complaining, mocking, and criticizing on TV, blogs and in my life in general about the abundance of the word "green" on everything...that it has suddenly become trendy to be in the counter-culture of "going green." I was at a work luncheon today when one of my co-workers started in on a rampage about compact fluorescent light bulbs. It went something like this:
Disgruntled Co-worker #1: I'm so sick of all of this green nonsense. It's just an excuse to slap a label on something and charge more money for it.
Bandwagon Co-worker #2: I know. It's all a plot to get you to replace everything in your house. Buy a new washer, because it's eco-friendly! Throw away your old light bulbs and get CFC's! What a joke.
I paused and thought of a nice way to express my opinion in the conversation. I said, "Well, yes, I think there are always predatory companies ready to exploit 'movements' in consumer culture. The upside, though, is that the mainstreaming of 'green' has resulted in lower prices for lots of legitimately eco-friendly products. That's good for the consumer who loves truly 'green' products and can now get them at the local grocery store. I think, too, that making it a household word results in getting people to do major impact, simple activities like recycling, because the word is out now."
They reflected for a moment before disgruntled co-worker #1 replied: "Right, but why should I have to use CFC's in my house? It's socially unacceptable to just use normal light bulbs now! And CFC's cast such an ugly light!" They then further descended into the conversation by hypothesizing that sooner or later, CFC's were going to be mandatory, like the water-conserving toilets, and when before that day came, they would stockpile the light bulbs that cast a softer glow, environment be damned.
These kinds of conversations irritate me. They are both intelligent women, and women I respect. I dislike when people chuck a perfectly valid concept like conserving resources on the only planet we've got because of the rugged individualist argument. How very American. I refrained from asking my co-worker how she felt about gifting her two small children with a completely polluted planet, robbed of precious resources because people didn't like the way the light bulbs cast a glow that made their grey walls look pasty. While of course it's debatable just how much of a difference your contribution makes in hard, tangible, quantifiable terms, my question is why not?? What do you have to lose? I'm not trying to be a fatalist that proclaims the planet will self-destruct by the year 2025, but for pete's sake, if you can buy a water conserving toilet or washing machine, or remember to unplug appliances in your house when you leave, or buy non-petroleum based cleaners at the store, WHY not? Does it really cost you that much more? Is the minor inconvenience of having bulbs that cast a dressing-room hue on your living room really worth the price if you're wrong, and resources are more limited than we believe them to be?
I concede that it's annoying that "green" has taken over the American dialog, and yes, I'm annoyed too, when I see things like "All-Natural Cheetohs" at the grocery store, and the abundance of sleaze bag corporations riding the environmentally friendly, health conscious wave by duping the average consumer. Yes, I'm concerned too that tricky questions are posed with energy saving products like CFCs, like the fact that if one does not properly recycle these bulbs, questions about the disposal of the mercury contained within raise valid questions. But this is how progress is made! Only when consumers respond with buying power can these products be improved to answer the tricky questions that arise. And ultimately, the consumer has the absolute responsibility to be an informed buyer. Cheetohs couldn't get away with selling a powdered cheese encrusted piece of styrofoam as "all-natural" and charging more for it, if there weren't consumers around to part with their money for it. We're responsible for doing our own homework for what makes a product truly green, or local, or organic or all-natural. Companies can't get away with defrauding us or milking a movement if people won't buy it.
And in the meantime, to the haters, complainers and grousers in general, I say this. Yes, I will continue to be proud of myself that I recycle, buy local and organic wherever I can, use energy-friendly appliances and cleaners in my home, keep my thermostat low, refrain from eating beef and other costly to produce foods, consult my Monterey Bay Aquarium sustainable seafood list when I grocery shop, and in general obey the New American Dream's creed of living more consciously, buying more wisely, and making a difference. And even though I still engage in some frivolous habits like excessive shoe buying (I am a product of my culture, after all) and wasting on occasion when I know I shouldn't, it feels good to be passionate about something, and to do my best. And I say to those skeptics, what are you doing to change the world you live in?
I have started my first non-academic book of the new year (#6 on my 27 things), which will probably be the source of many posts, because I'm just enamored. Animal, Vegetable, Miracle was a gift from my friend L, and is also by one of my favorite authors, Barbara Kingsolver (if you've never read The Poisonwood Bible, The Bean Trees, or Animal Dreams, I highly recommend...she's wonderful). While she writes a lot of fiction, AVM is the chronicle of her family's journey to eat local for a year. From their own farm, or from the local community, Kingsolver and her family embark on a great experiment...to eat sustainably, and with the seasons.
What gave me pause so early in the book, though, is Kingsolver's discussion of "food culture." Kingsolver suggests that a food culture asks, "who is us, exactly?" How do we Americans identify ourselves through our connection to food rituals, traditions and recipes? Further broken down, what fruits and vegetables are in season, which ones keep through winter, and how do we preserve food? "What animals and vegetables thrive in one's immediate region, and how do we live well on those, with little else thrown in the mix besides a bag of flour, and a pinch of salt?" It is what Kingsolver calls, our "story of bread." Except that America has no story of bread, really. Modern Americans are completely divorced from the process of agriculture and how we could feed ourselves based on what food is available here in our region, what's available and what's in season, instead of hey! it's on the shelf, so I'm going to buy it. We are attracted to food without understanding what it's made of and how much it cost to get it here, or take it from other human beings. Bananas from South America. Hamburger Helper. Spaghetti sauce loaded with foreign tomatoes, preservatives, and high fructose corn syrup. McDonald's. Funyons. Little Debbies. The list goes on. If we are what eat, what do the choices (and accordingly, the obesity level) of Americans say about us? I'm kind of embarrassed of the answer.
What really brought this argument into focus for me is Kingsolver's evaluation of other food cultures. She's not trying to be unnecessarily hard on Americans and their divorce from the soil. There was a time in American history where people knew where their food came from, and shopped at the local farmer's stand, or the local grocery where the local farmer sold his goods. As the American economy exploded, we all know what happened from there. Walmart, genetically modified foods, skewed subsidies for the wrong crops and free trade landed us where we are today. We don't even know how a potato grows, or how that chicken breast got into pretty little cellophane and Styrofoam package, ready to eat. Wishing it wasn't so doesn't change anything, and some of the evolution has been the result of positive change for a growing and expanding economy. As Kingsolver points out, though, how have other nations still preserved their food culture, their identity through food custom and ritual, while commodification of agriculture and economic expansion occurred? Why are the French not enamored by the idea of a McDonald's on every corner? Why would the Japanese run screaming at the suggestion of the Atkins diet? As Kingsolver points out, after all of the change and evolution in agriculture worldwide, the Italians still eat Italian, and the Japanese still eat Japanese. Other countries still honor "ancient synergies between what their land can give and what their bodies need. Strong food cultures are both aesthetic and functional, keeping the quality and quantity of foods consumed relatively consistent from one generation to the next." She says, "at its heart, a genuine food culture is an affinity between people and the land that feeds them."
Hmmm. Food for thought. It got me thinking that food culture in the United States can have two congruous and compatible meanings, and does to me. The thing is, huge pockets of subculture exist in a country as large as the United States. Italy and Japan do have an easier time preserving a food identity, because the terrain, soil and environment is largely similar throughout all of their land. So, what goes in North Carolina doesn't go in North Dakota, or even in California. We're a little different everywhere you go in America. This is also evidenced by the existence of regional "specialties." Southern food is famously different from comfort foods of the Midwest. So food culture, in my mind, is about the history of your region (or even your family), its traditions, recipes, customs, and also how those specialties relate to the above questions about agriculture: what food is available here in our region, what's available and what's in season?
So, when I thought about this post, I thought about how wonderful it would be to share my own family's food culture, the culture I grew up with, and the culture I'm still shaping for my family today. More importantly, because so many of my neighbors are from different countries, regions or cities, I want to know how others perceive both their childhood food culture, and the food culture they have with their own families today. How do we preserve our family's traditions and customs and what it taught us about food, while reconciling that with what we know today, that we are responsible for educating ourselves about food sources and making better choices.
I grew up in Toledo, Ohio, a blue-collar manufacturing town in the Rust Belt, to two parents who were married straight out of the gate from high school. My dad worked driving a truck when I was too young to remember, and his job was frequently under assault by layoffs or cutbacks, meaning our family was either flush with cash or too poor to buy groceries. By the time my Mom was 24, she had three kids and not a lot of money to spread around on the dinner table. What characterized our very early family years, the years I barely remember, was scarcity. My mom's food philosophy was about stretching a dollar as thin as it could possibly go. She made up some of her own recipes, like basic casseroles consisting of noodles with cream soups or flavored with bouillon, and canned vegetables, and meat, if there was money. These casseroles could go a long way for a family of five. The early years inadvertently set us up for the way my mom would feed us forever, even in the years where financial prosperity had finally arrived at our door. Casseroles and stick-to-your-ribs kind of meals were staples in our house, and synonymous with comfort food. We were still requesting my Mom's chicken and noodles one pot meal of the lean years (it really is that delicious!) in high school and beyond. These foods mean comfort and family to us.
The efficiency of the early years carried over too. After years of having to be painfully organized about meal preparation (because if she wasn't, there wouldn't be enough to feed us all for a week at time), she kept it up as a matter of course. Every week, she sat down and meal planned for entire week, seven meals on the table, and grocery shopped based on that. There was always variety on our table, and we were never bored because she was so organized, meals didn't often repeat within the same month. Her non-casserole meals were always accompanied by the appropriate portions of meat, starch and vegetable. Meatloaf, mashed potatoes, and corn. Fried chicken, roasted potato quarters, green beans. Cube steak, rice, and broccoli. Pork chops, cheesy potatoes, and lima beans.
She never cooked with the help of packaged goods. This again, traced back to the early years, when buying meat, potatoes and a canned vegetable was cheaper than a boxed meal that fed half the amount of servings. She even fed us off a backyard vegetable garden for a few years. We grew up without ever having Hamburger Helper, box macaroni and cheese, or canned soups for dinner. There weren't a lot of processed foods like packaged cookies, or dinners at McDonald's or pizza nights. Even pizza was homemade. My mom was anti-soda and anti-juice before it was cool to be so. She thought it was a waste of money when water was just as good. It was such an anomaly in our neighborhood and among my friends, that I actually used to complain to my mom, "why can't we ever just have mac and cheese for dinner?" or "can't we just go to McDonald's tonight?" I remember being disgruntled that there wasn't a copious bounty of Oreos, Nutter Butters, and pop in our house like those of my friends. Oops. Sorry Mom!
Anyway, the food culture in our home was one of inadvertent benefits. My mom didn't mean to, but she taught us a lot about the value of knowing where your food came from, because you cooked it. While based in poverty originally, our food culture morphed into one of food being the centerpiece of the home. My mom believe strongly in homemade meals characterized by comfort food, and the kitchen table being a place of family gathering. She believed that package dinners and fizzy drinks were wasteful, and she could make anything better herself. Where that leaves the culture of my food philosophy today is that I have inherited her belief that eating at home is healthier, less expensive, and a source of bonding for a family. There's nothing that can compare to the sense of accomplishment and taste when you've taught yourself how to make a chocolate cake from scratch, or you've mastered your first Thai dish and your family lights up at the dinner table in approval. I am much more experimental in cooking than my mom was, favoring anything Thai, Chinese or Indian for the sake of a good experiment. I've strayed from both her tendency to serve red meat as the centerpiece of a meal, and her affinity for frying things in Crisco. I also hate soda and juice, and consider them not only financially wasteful, but thanks to our generation getting more education on the subject, unhealthy.
I am most grateful that my mom taught me cooking is love, which is a LARGE part of the food culture around here. Both love for your family, and love for yourself. The vegetable chopping, simmering oil and garlic and spices in the pan, the pop of sizzling potatoes in the oven...that's heaven for me. Serving a plate full of something born of your own hard work and efforts to a friend or your children, even better (unless of course said child turns up her nose...then it's a bit less heavenly).
If I could inject anything into our food culture, it would be to take the next step that Kingsolver suggests. I have a benefit my mom did not: an education in food. I understand that cooking without processed food is about more than a financial choice or preference, it's about health. And I have other alternatives. I can buy from a local farmer, because farmer's markets, CSA and organic sales are on the rise, and on the radar in a way they weren't during my childhood. I could conceivably supply most of my grocery needs right in my good, old neighborhood. There are local farmers here that sell dairy, cheese, poultry, and others that sell every fruit and vegetable I might need. I would like to educate myself more about what's in season and what's local. I would like to cook with a pinch of salt and a bag of flour, as Kingsolver suggests, and not much else. I would like to raise my children with trips to our local farms and farmer's market, and give them a good education about where food comes from. I would like to garden. I would like to learn how to can or freeze my own food. I would like to attain the synergy Kingsolver speaks of between land and the way we eat in this house. Combining the history of food culture from my childhood, with the things I know today about our responsibility to eat, well, more responsibly, would give us a very rich food culture indeed. I'll keep you posted!
So, now what I want to know is, what was your childhood food culture, and what is it now that you have your own family? What were the traditions, customs or recipes of your childhood, and have you infused that with the knowledge we have today about where food comes from? Do share! In your own post, or comment here, I'd love to know what the food culture is in your family! (just be sure to comment if you do make your own post, so we can all read!)
Thanks to Tamzen for the great idea! I will be creating a post on Monday, October 15th, dedicated to the environment. I also want to take the site's suggestion and donate to a favorite environmental organization on Monday. Not sure what I'm going to write about yet, but I'll come up with something good, and I hope everybody joins me in dedicating their blog to being a greenie for a day! I have long liked the idea of uniting bloggers for the common good, to draw attention to causes we share in common. It helps remind me not to be totally self-absorbed and indulgent in signing on each day and spending hours writing about...myself.
Visit Blog Action Day for more information.